A. Victoria Mixon, Editor Services Home About Contact Magazine
Subscribe [RSS]
Follow Me [twitter]
Copyright
  • Dear Major Bradon,

    I’ll keep this simple for you.

    Technomancy: The fine art of combining science and sorcery.
    Technomancers: People who manage to survive combining science and sorcery.

    Did I mention that there aren’t that many of us?

    We’ve been called many things over the years, alchemists, magicians… But don’t get hung up on whole ‘sorcery’ thing. Technology is what it’s really all about. Take a look at my business, I can apply occult biometrics to anything. Yes, even swords in stones, though I’d recommend sticking with more modern technology, it works better. Trust me, if Merlin would’ve had a chain gun with a biometric trigger-lock keyed to Arthur, he’d have used it. The crazy old codger would have loved the idea of guns.

    I don’t think I need to tell you not to try this at home. Actually, don’t try it all, stick to the military. You’ll live longer.
    —Angie Capozello

    Developmental Edit

    I love that Merlin’s gun would be keyed to Arthur. Terrific eye for the telling detail!

    Detailed? check
    Threatening? check
    Raises a question? check Who’s threatening Major Bradon?
    Drop-kicks us off the end? check Don’t try what at home?

    What does this paragraph tell us about the book we’re starting? Major Bradon doesn’t understand Technomancers. In fact, it looks like he’s thinking about messing with them. Someone is warning him not to—on pain of shortening his life.

    Do I want to follow this character through a whole novel? I’m not completely certain what character we’re dealing with. I get the impression it’s not Major Bradon. It must be the anonymous author of the letter. They sound intelligent, creative, assertive, and a bit smart-aleck. I like that!

    Genre? Fantasy, possibly sci fi, possibly violent with that reference to the military.

    Do we need to know who the character is, how they got here, where they were before? We know quite a bit about this narrator, what they do, how they do it, why they’re squaring off against Major Bradon and his military. That’s great!

    Do we need to know what happens next? I hoping we cut directly to a scene in which either the narrator looks up from writing the letter or Major Bradon looks up from reading it.

    Does this paragraph drop us right smack in a specific moment in this character’s story? Well, the personal address to another character tells us we’re in an exchange. So that’s immediate. But I’m hoping to meet a character directly any second.

    So let’s talk about the structure of it. There is a problem here, and that is that agents and publishers don’t particularly like stories that start with letters anymore. I think it confuses them. Whatever the reason is, it’s a strike against you. And your hook is not a good place to have a strike against you.

    There’s also the grammar in the first sentence about Merlin. This might very well be intended to illustrate the voice of the narrator, in which case we keep it. (But if it’s an author error, it needs to be corrected.)

    Other than that, there’s a whole lot of information packed into character communication, with good motivation so it doesn’t sound contrived. And the narrator’s character comes through clearly. Excellent stuff!

    Can this be made shorter and snappier, keeping the 1st-person address to Major Bradon without relying on a letter format?

    Copy & Line Edit

    I’ll keep this simple, Major Bradon. Don’t get hung up on the whole ’sorcery’ thing. Technology is what it’s all about.

    Look at my business: a Technomancer can apply occult biometrics to anything. Yes, even swords in stones, although I’d recommend sticking with more modern technology than that. Trust me, if that crazy old codger Merlin would’ve had a chain gun with a biometric trigger-lock keyed to Arthur, he’d have used it.

    I don’t need to tell you not to try this at home. Actually, don’t try it all.

    Stick to the military. You’ll live longer.

    No Comments

No Responses to “Free HOOK Edit: Dear Major Bradon—”

  1. Thanks for the tip about not starting with letters! I had planned on beginning each major section with another snarky set of notes between the two, but now I’ll have to rethink that a bit.

    I’ve definately been struggling with the Merlin line – trying to get the voice right without tripping up the reader. I think I’ve re-written that one paragraph about 50 times already. Do you think leaving in the quirky grammar would be a deal breaker?

    And yes, you do get to meet Nox in the next paragraph. She’s fiesty, cantankerous, and I am having no end of fun writing this character ;)

  2. Angie,

    The quirky grammar is great as long as you’re using it to illuminate this character. It absolutely puts the reader in the head of the narrator. My only concern was that some new writers accidentally use poor grammar they mean to be correct.

    I think you’d be perfectly safe using a brief passage like this in italics to introduce each major section. The key is to keep it brief and extremely tight. You don’t have to make it clear they’re addressing each other in writing—that can be mentioned or even just suggested in the story. It’s a trivial point so long as the reader is swept up on their actual relationship.

    What matters is this subtle extra layer that doesn’t interfere with the flow of the plot.

    Victoria

  3. I like the contrast between science and sorcery. Using the reference to Merlin in something that’s apparently high-tech sci/fi is great. It sounds very interesting!

  4. Really like the voice of this, the tone is so sassy! And the Merlin reference made us see more than you actually wrote, instant mental picture. Great!

  5. In the first sentence three words pop out: “Major”, “technology”, and “sorcery”. A person would expect the first two to go together, but sorcery is like the opposite pole on a magnet. That raised my curiosity to see what is going on here.

    Your approach has imagination.

Leave a Reply



Upcoming Release: March 2010
All aspects of writing fiction explored copiously, luxuriously, minutely, indiscriminately, and with a certain amount of personal prejudice.

Clients’ Books


Bhaichand Patel is the author of two nonfiction books: Chasing the Good Life (Penguin Books India, October, 2006), and Happy Hours (Penguin Books India, October, 2009). I recently edited Patel's debut novel, When the Streets Were Dark and Cold.


Although my contribution to Baby Jesus Pawn Shop was only a peer critique and participation in a standing ovation, in 2009 I edited two nonfiction essays for my friend Lucia Orth.


The poet Chris Ryan is the author of The Bible of Animal Feet (Farfalla Press, 2007). He has new stories forthcoming in Pank, Anemone Sidecar, and A Cappella Zoo. I edited Ryan's debut novel The Ishmael Blade.


I edited Pushcart Prize nominee Ania Vesenny's debut novel, Swearing in Russian at the Northern Lights, forthcoming from the Invisible Press, 2011.