<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking about a small, good thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://victoriamixon.com/2009/12/01/talking-about-a-small-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://victoriamixon.com/2009/12/01/talking-about-a-small-good-thing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://victoriamixon.com/2009/12/01/talking-about-a-small-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2078</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://victoriamixon.com/?p=3627#comment-2078</guid>
		<description>Yes, Marie, it does throw a whole new light on the publishing industry, doesn&#039;t it? That such a thing could have happened to someone as widely-read and respected as Carver? That Gordon Lish---who has a huge reputation---could have been that freaking ignorant about the whole craft of editing?

It&#039;s a piranha pool out here, folks. You really need to be prepared.

And, for the record, a professional editor edits as little as humanly possible while aiming for the highest possible quality. It is not only perfectly possible, I do it all the time. If a piece needs the kind of deep and devastating cuts that King says Lish did to Carver&#039;s work---well, they might as well just send it back. According to King, the cuts weren&#039;t necessary for quality, only to adapt Carver&#039;s work to Lish&#039;s voice. And I&#039;m going to go out on a limb here and say I trust King&#039;s judgment. 

That review&#039;s a pleasure to read simply because it&#039;s so well-written. King&#039;s &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt;.

Victoria</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Marie, it does throw a whole new light on the publishing industry, doesn&#8217;t it? That such a thing could have happened to someone as widely-read and respected as Carver? That Gordon Lish&#8212;who has a huge reputation&#8212;could have been that freaking ignorant about the whole craft of editing?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a piranha pool out here, folks. You really need to be prepared.</p>
<p>And, for the record, a professional editor edits as little as humanly possible while aiming for the highest possible quality. It is not only perfectly possible, I do it all the time. If a piece needs the kind of deep and devastating cuts that King says Lish did to Carver&#8217;s work&#8212;well, they might as well just send it back. According to King, the cuts weren&#8217;t necessary for quality, only to adapt Carver&#8217;s work to Lish&#8217;s voice. And I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb here and say I trust King&#8217;s judgment. </p>
<p>That review&#8217;s a pleasure to read simply because it&#8217;s so well-written. King&#8217;s <em>good</em>.</p>
<p>Victoria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Devers</title>
		<link>http://victoriamixon.com/2009/12/01/talking-about-a-small-good-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-2019</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Devers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://victoriamixon.com/?p=3627#comment-2019</guid>
		<description>Punny blog title. Thanks for linking to that article. It made my lunch infinitely more enjoyable. It also made me wonder how much I would compromise my work to please an editor who held my success in his or her back pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Punny blog title. Thanks for linking to that article. It made my lunch infinitely more enjoyable. It also made me wonder how much I would compromise my work to please an editor who held my success in his or her back pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

